Pepijn Bastiaansen vs Reuben De Klerk Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 26 Feb at 03:52 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
P. Bastiaansen vs R. De Klerk

NED
1
Win
Played
0
Win

RSA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Bastiaansen 1 - 0 Klerk
They have played 2 sets in total, with Pepijn Bastiaansen winning 2 and Reuben De Klerk winning 0. The last match between Pepijn Bastiaansen and Reuben De Klerk was at the M15 Pretoria, 26-02-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Pepijn Bastiaansen getting the victory 6-4 6-0.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Bastiaansen | 1 |
Klerk | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Pretoria(02-26-25)
P. Bastiaansen vs R. D. Klerk H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
50.65% (39-38) | Career Total W/L | 30.00% (3-7) |
1 | Hard | 0 |
1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
P. Bastiaansen vs R. D. Klerk Match Preview:
Analyzing the second serve performance over the past six months, Bastiaansen has demonstrated superior skill by winning 46.7% of points on their second serve, compared to Klerk’s 37.76%. Such a margin in winning percentage often translates to higher match prediction accuracy due to its impact on game dynamics. In return games, Bastiaansen continues to show dominant form, having won 57.14% of her opponent's second serve points, while Klerk stands at 45%. First serve return statistics similarly favor Bastiaansen, who has won 34.31% of points compared to Klerk’s 31.1%. These stats contribute significantly to determining the likely favorite in this matchup.
When evaluating under pressure performance, Bastiaansen holds a further advantage, having saved 57.41% of breakpoints recently, while Klerk has saved 41.38%. Breakpoint saving capability is a critical factor, especially for in-game betting predictions. Additionally, over the last year, Bastiaansen's match play results stand at 56%, with a win-loss record of 14-11 across various tournaments. Conversely, Klerk has managed a 33.33% win rate with a record of 3-6. Such statistics provide a comprehensive overview and incline the prediction towards Bastiaansen when considering head-to-head analysis.
Both players show distinct surface preferences, with Bastiaansen achieving her best career results on Hard courts with a win percentage of 57% (W/L 17-13), whereas Klerk also seems to perform best on Hard courts but only achieves a 33% win rate (W/L 3-6). Player level analysis reveals that Bastiaansen often competes in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 56% of her matches, while Klerk competes in the same tiers but only secures a 33.33% win rate, thus relativizing the predictive favoritism based on competition level.
Evaluating opponent quality, Bastiaansen has faced opponents with an average rank of 299.12 over the past 12 months, suggesting less challenging competition compared to Klerk, who faced opponents with an average rank of 125.56. Additionally, in deciding sets, a crucial phase for in-play forecasts, Bastiaansen boasts a 60% success rate, compared to Klerk's 33% across all tour matches. Breakpoint conversion rates offer another interesting comparison, with Bastiaansen converting 46.3% of opportunities, closely matched by Klerk at 46.15%. While both demonstrate comparable efficiency in capitalizing on breaking opportunities, the broader spectrum of statistics leans toward Bastiaansen's favor.
Considering these detailed performance assessments, it is evident that Bastiaansen holds an overall advantage based on recent performances and statistical comparisons. Consequently, Bastiaansen is predicted to have a higher likelihood of emerging victorious in this upcoming match against Klerk.
Pepijn Bastiaansen vs Reuben De Klerk Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
P. Bastiaansen vs R. D. Klerk H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
12 | Games Won | 4 |
10 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
2 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
1:17:50 | Average Match Time | 1:17:50 |
52% (31/60) | 1st Serve % | 66% (31/47) |
84% (26/31) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (21/31) |
48% (14/29) | 2nd Serve Win % | 31% (5/16) |
67% (4/6) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/4) |
45% (21/47) | Return Points Win % | 33% (20/60) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
P. Bastiaansen Recent Matches Played
R. D. Klerk Recent Matches Played

P. Bastiaansen vs R. D. Klerk Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
50.65% (39/38) | YTD Win/Loss | 30.00% (3/7) |
49.43% (87/89) | Sets Win/Loss | 34.78% (8/15) |
50.66% (839/817) | Games Win/Loss | 42.86% (108/144) |
58.33% (21/15) | Hard Win/Loss | 30.00% (3/7) |
45.95% (17/20) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
25.00% (1/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
0.09 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 |
73 | Aces Total | 4 |
0.13 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
109 | Total Double Faults | 27 |
1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:33:55 |
219.42 | Average Opponent Rank | 119.7 |
60% (1333/2232) | 1st Serve % | 63% (354/566) |
62% (829/1333) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (212/354) |
47% (426/899) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (84/212) |
42% (93/220) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 55% (16/29) |
41% (890/2184) | Return Points Win % | 38% (219/574) |
50.65% (39/38) | Futures W/L | 30.00% (3/7) |
50% (38/76) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 30% (3/10) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
54% (7/13) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 80% (4/5) |
57% (12/21) | Deciding Set Win % | 33% (1/3) |
84% (37/31) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) |
16% (37/6) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (2/0) |
20% (40/8) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (8/1) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Prediction Of Buyunchaokete Vs Zhizhen H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Basavareddy Vs Cilic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Berrettini Vs Svrcina H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?
